🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on sending state troops in the Oregon city, after a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent turn in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that local officers have command of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland issued two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to evade the first order by mobilizing troops from California.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”